Showing posts with label carly fiorina. Show all posts
Showing posts with label carly fiorina. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 9, 2016

Winner Take All - 15 March - Trump or Cruz?

Who are Trump supporters? We are hard working Americans who don't suck up to anyone and live our lives independent of those who suck up to others for personal gain. We love our country and our families - we work and sacrifice for them - not like people who suck up to others to gain an advantage for themselves. We expect the government to protect our Constitution and way of Liberty - not for those in government to increase power, influence, and reward to themselves and impose themselves on us - we see the economic oppression and the taking of our Liberty.

Most of us like the Donald because he is like us - he works hard - has enjoyed success at what he does - is not a government laky - tells it the way he sees it - doesn't take crap from anyone - is confident in his own abilities - loves his family and his country - loves his Liberty - builds things that last.

Because Ted Cruz is highly intellectual, professionally accomplished, and a Senator, we tend to view him with suspicion. But when many of us look closer we see he has a proven record of governance in exactly the way we expect it to be. As a lawyer he has defended our Constitutional way of life successfully nine times before the Supreme Court. He went to Washington as a Senator for Texas and stood up to represent them - not the “elite suck-up crowd” that feeds off the “donor class” and represents the donors rather than us folks back home. The “Republican establishment” does not like him - a great endorsement for Cruz! No one questions this history. It is well-established. It is well known. As Rush Limbaugh says, he is the only true conservative in the field.

As “Outsiders” fed up with Washington and the corrupting of our Representatives, we have just two choices left for President: Ted Cruz or Donald Trump. Sadly Dr. Carson is out of the race. Trump called for Rubio and Kasich to drop out so that he and Ted Cruz can fight it out to the Convention. That works for me - it gets the insiders out - but I think it unlikely because the Republican “establishment”, as illustrated by Romney’s recent speech against Trump, are unwilling to endorse Cruz - they want Kasich and Rubio to remain in the race to force a brokered Convention where they can exercise their control. So, if you are against the establishment, DO NOT FOLLOW ROMNEY’S COUNSEL TO VOTE FOR CRUZ, RUBIO, OR KASICH. We outsiders need to vote Cruz or Trump - period.

Ted Cruz won his home State of Texas easily. Obviously Texan’s are happy with him. Compare this with Florida where Trump is beating Floridian Marco Rubio in the polls - which so far have been accurate. Cruz is the only real competitor to Donald Trump with 362 delegates to Trumps 463. I love Trump and if he gets the nomination I will be all in for him; however, I feel more secure in getting Cruz nominated because of his established record of Constitutional governance. I want “Trump only” supporters to consider Cruz as a better choice. I want Rubio and Kasich supporters to switch to Cruz. This would be especially effective in Florida which has a Primary open to Republicans only and is a “winner takes all delegates” State. It would be nice if Rubio recognizes he is not going to win the nomination and endorses Ted Cruz before the Florida vote, 15 March. If Rubio were to endorse Cruz and pledge his delegates we would have Cruz ahead with 517 delegates. If Kasich were to endorse Cruz before the open Ohio Primary on 15 March, that would bring Cruz’s delegate count up to 571. Carly Fiorina has just endorsed Ted Cruz, http://therightscoop.com/awesome-here-is-carly-fiorinas-official-statement-endorsing-ted-cruz/ , so how about it Rubio, Kasich, Bush, Huckabee, and Paul? If Dr. Carson were to endorse Ted that would show that he has accepted Cruz’s personal and public apology for his staff’s mishandling of the CNN report in the middle of the Iowa Caucus. Potentially we could see Cruz at 586 delegates with all those endorsements.

Cruz has clearly stood up against the Washington establishment and Special-Interest as a Texas Senator in Washington. We saw this again where he opposed the ethanol subsidy benefiting Iowa WHILE IN THE IOWA CAMPAIGN! The Iowa Governor came out hard against him but Cruz held true to Constitutional principles and won the Iowa Caucus. Trump pandered to Iowans by favoring the subsidy and lost! This tells us a lot about both candidates and puts Cruz on top for me. Trump may make good deals, but I don't think they will all be based on the principles of Liberty and limited government as expressed in our Constitution. 

Having a Constitutionalist for President will be even more critical if Obama succeeds in getting another liberal onto the Supreme Court to replace conservative Antonin Scalia. The clearest choice for holding the Constitutional line and for nominating strong Constitutionalists for the Supreme Court is Ted Cruz.

The Donald, by his own admission, was a participant in Washington corruption - he played the game! Can we trust him now? Why should we risk that when we have a proven Constitutionalist in Cruz? Trump has certainly tapped into our anger, but is the National Review correct that he is not a conservative and perhaps a liberal in sheep's clothing? Is Jimmy Carter correct that Trump is “… completely malleable (and) … he has (no) fixed opinions that he would really go to the White House and fight for”? As CNN reported, “By contrast, Mr. Carter said, ‘Ted Cruz is not malleable. He has far right-wing policies, in my opinion, that would be pursued aggressively if and when he would become president.’” - a great endorsement for Ted Cruz!

I read Donald Trump’s book Crippled America, How to Make America Great Again, and found it very interesting. He does talk about the importance of the Constitution and he identifies the problems of a dictator-in-chief who governs by Executive Orders, and the Judicial branch legislating from the bench. 

I suspect many of you have not read Trump's book. I noted in an earlier blog that I consider his tax plan to be unconstitutional. I agree with Dr Carson and Ted Cruz that any tax plan that has different rates of taxation for different citizens is in violation of the 14th Amendment requirement for equality under the law. Apart from that objection are there other indications Trump will not follow the Constitution? 

Here are some quotes from his book. He says he will uphold the Constitution and cripple Special-Interests. But will he? Has he in the past?

1. His “Angry Trump” book cover reflects the mood of most Americans:

“I wanted a picture where I wasn't happy, a picture that reflected the anger and unhappiness that I feel … we are not in a joyous situation … we have to go back to work to make America great again. All of us.”

Most of us agree with this sentiment.

2. Trump teaches us how he plays the Media to his benefit. This explained a lot for me, and why I find myself laughing at how Trump plays the elitist mainstream media, but it also cautions me that he is playing us just as any populist politician would:

“I use the media the way the media uses me - to attract attention. Once I have that attention, it's up to me to use it to my advantage ... to inspire people to think that our country can get better and be great again and that we can turn things around ... I have a mutually profitable two-way relationship with the media - we give each other what we need. And now I am using that relationship to talk about the future of America.”

“Begging for attention really sums up the problem we face in this country with our media. There is such a competition that they're more interested in entertaining their audience then educating them. They like me because I help them attract more viewers. They hate me because they know I don't need them. (Is this the point he reinforced by dumping a Fox debate?) I learned a long time ago how to talk directly to the people who matter - to regular Americans who are fed up with the career politicians.”

"I always draw a large crowd of journalists who are like sharks, hoping I'll put some blood in the water.”
   I try to oblige.”

In his manipulation of the mainstream media and his political incorrectness I say “Go Trump - Go!” But is he doing the same thing to us and will he govern as he claims? We know he is a highly successful builder, so I assume that he will run the country well. But will he also manipulate the Constitution to his benefit?

3. The Constitution. Trump is not a Constitutional expert like Cruz. He is more like a regular guy who knows it has worked for America and for him, and he supports it. The fact that his tax plan is contrary to the 14th Amendment’s requirement for equality under the law he probably has not considered - most candidates (except Cruz and Carson) have not. He is concerned about judicial and presidential dictatorship and the influence of Special-Interest:

“… our lawyers and judges … have been stepping all over the US Constitution, the bulwark of our democracy. They have recklessly appointed themselves to be policy makers, because our actual elected officials are paralyzed by partisanship.”

“I support a tight interpretation of the Constitution, which means judges should stick to precedent and not write social policy.”

“We need to appoint justices - not just on the Supreme Court, but throughout the entire federal system - who will leave lawmaking to the legislators, as specified in the Constitution.”

“The Supreme Court has decided in their infinite wisdom to fill a breach (of leadership) by making social policy rather than defending our most precious historic assets, the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights.”
   We have three branches of government, but the trunk of that tree is rotting away.” 

“The free market works - it just needs leadership, not dictatorship. Our government needs to employ a strong adherence to the Constitution ….”

"We need leadership in the White House that will keep government functioning while getting the feds out of all the areas where they don't belong. If the government is properly sized and properly focused we won't need to go from crisis to crisis.”

I think he likes the Constitution in general but will he honor it in specifics after he swears to defend it against all enemies, foreign and domestic, or will he be “… completely malleable” as President Carter predicts?

4. Health Care. Trump admits to supporting a single-payer system 15 years ago but now he talks of competition between private insurance companies: 

"I'd like to see a private insurance system without artificial lines drawn between states. We need to get rid of those lines and let people and companies cross state lines to purchase the best plan for them. The government should get out of the way and let insurance companies compete for your business.”

5. Political Corruption. This is our greatest concern and Trump was a participant - he doesn't deny it - can we expect him to be clean as President? Here is what he has said:

“For years I gave money - lots of money - to candidates from both parties who made personal pleas for my support for their campaigns. They promised to change things with new ideas and bring government back to its original, more limited purpose of protecting our country and putting our people first. Candidate after candidate made all kinds of pledges like this, and very little, if anything, was done.” This is our experience - magnified by the little attention our small donations demanded.

"To hear our left-wing critics tell it, we need socialism to make this country move forward, and we need a president who can make up the rules as he goes along. If he can't get Congress to do something, he needs to rule by executive order.”
   I say that's complete nonsense.”
   The free market works - it just needs leadership, not dictatorship. Our government needs to employ a strong adherence to the Constitution and maintain social programs that inspire and reward achievement and that are constantly accountable for their spending and outcomes ... I am concerned for the people who can't buy into the American dream because the financial programs of this country is so tilted in favor of the rich."

"Making America Great Again means taking our country back from the big-money interests. We have a country where the big problems can't be solved by consensus because the small-minded lobbyists and special interests are clogging the halls of Congress with their ‘special access.’”
   Everyone talks about listening to the voice of the people. But how can you hear that voice when no one represents that voice? I am listening.”

“No one is paying me to say these things. I am paying my own way, and I'm not beholden to any special interests and lobbyists.”

6. Is Trump Believable?:

“You can believe what I say, because to see what I've accomplished, all you need to do is take a nice walk through the greatest cities of the world - and look up. Look up, and you'll see the Trump buildings rising skyward.”

Yes, but we also see his record of donations to Liberals and support of Liberal objectives. He says he has converted - like Ronald Reagan did. But we got to see and watch Reagan the Conservative long before he ran for President. We KNOW Cruz is a Conservative - we have seen him in action. We do not KNOW Donald is - we can only hope he is genuine and I am not in favor of more “hope and change” - I want a return to Constitutional governance.

I completely agree with Donald on this point: “We are at a critical turning point in our history, not only for you and for me but for our children as well. America may be struggling, it may be crippled, but we can rise again. Our time has not passed, it is here, and the potential is amazing.”

Cruz has PROVEN he is a Constitutionalist. Trump says he is (now). I am going for Cruz - please join me. We need to strengthen Cruz before the Republican Convention - not Rubio who sold himself to the Gang of Eight amnesty crowd in Washington. Remember it was Cruz who stopped that bill in its tracks by exposing the bill’s path to citizenship for illegals. I don't get to vote until 22 March, so I want Florida, Illinois, Missouri, North Carolina, and Ohio to give Ted a clean sweep. Don’t believe the Trump-Rubio claims that Cruz is a liar. Both Rush Limbaugh and Bret Baier have looked into those accusations and overturned them. Remember also the Telemundo reporter that highlighted Rubio’s lie in a recent debate and verified Cruz’s accusation.

Vote for Liberty and the Constitution - vote for Cruz! 

Kiwi


Tuesday, October 6, 2015

Constitutional Republican or Progressive Democrat in 2016 - A Mormon's Doctrinal Choice


This is an update to my October, 2012 post, Obama or Romney - A Mormon's Doctrinal Choice. It is updated to reflect the current campaign for the U.S. presidency in 2016. I have retained President Obama to represent the Progressive Democrat agenda that Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, or Bernie Sanders will pursue if they are elected. I replace Governor Romney with the phrase “Constitutional Republican” in the expectation that the Republican nominee will be pro-Constitution.

The October 2012, Semi-annual General Conference of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon or LDS Church) concluded without the Church endorsing Mormon Governor Mitt Romney for President of the United States. Neither Mormon Prophet Thomas S. Monson nor any other Church leader encouraged Mormons to vote for Romney in any way.  For those not familiar with the Church this was in keeping with the Church's doctrine on individual liberty and choice and is applicable to the upcoming 2016 Presidential Election. 

The face of Mormonism in politics today is probably best reflected in two characters - Senator Harry Reid and former Republican Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney. This also reflects a division within Mormonism on politics - Reid, liberal Democrat; Romney, conservative Republican. For the purposes of the 2016 presidential race, a Mormon's liberal Democrat choice can be represented by President Obama whom Senator Reid supports. The Church does not tell its members how to vote, and there is a strong doctrinal case to be made for that principle; however, in my view, the same doctrine supports an individual member voting against President Obama or a progressive Democrat successor.

The first 2012 Presidential debate, 3 Oct 2012, highlighted this doctrinal point. Mormons seriously considered voting for Governor Romney, not because he was a Mormon, but because he held up "God's" Constitution and President Obama did not. Mormons doctrinally accept that the US Constitution was established by God to protect His children's individual liberty. The Governor specifically referred to these documents and their principles of protecting life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, and a limited Federal government. President Obama made no reference to the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution when asked about the role of government. Even following Governor Romney's direct reference to these documents and the role of government in upholding their principles, President Obama made no statement of agreement. 

President Obama's views on the US Constitution may not be well known, but his expressed views are available for evaluation. He has described the Constitution as "fundamentally flawed from its founding", and advocates for income redistribution through extra-Constitutional legislative and administrative means. From a Mormon doctrine perspective, his views concerning the Constitution are not the same as God's stated view. As a faithful Mormon I believed I could not stand with God while also standing for Mr. Obama as President, or any Progressive Democrat. Let me explain.

As a Mormon immigrant to the US and as a US military officer with 35 years of active duty service, I have felt it a great privilege to serve under an oath to defend the US Constitution and I wish to do so here. I will lay out the Mormon case for individual liberty and the Constitution, and then against the President who took the constitutionally-required oath of office to "faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and ... to the best of (his) ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

THE "MORMON" CASE FOR INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY AND THE US CONSTITUTION

As a young New Zealand citizen and Mormon, I read revelations of God to the Prophet Joseph Smith (detailed below) in which God said "Therefore, it is not right that any man should be in bondage one to another. And for this purpose have I established the Constitution of this land (the USA), by the hands of wise men whom I raised up unto this very purpose .... And that law of  the land which is constitutional, supporting that principle of freedom in maintaining rights and privileges, belongs to all mankind, and is justifiable before me. Therefore, I, the Lord, justify you, and your brethren of my church, in befriending that law which is the constitutional law of the land; and as pertaining to law of man, whatsoever is more or less than this, cometh of evil."

Why would God lay claim that He "established the Constitution"? Mormons know that God's greatest heritage to His children is individual liberty or "agency." That heritage was established in Heaven, before His children came to Earth. God rejected a plan from Lucifer (Satan) who "sought to destroy the agency of man, which I, the Lord God, had given him" and "there was war in heaven" to preserve that sacred liberty. God knew His children would make mistakes with their liberty while on Earth but "God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son (Jesus Christ), that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life(John 3:16). The Savior was required because God preserved the liberty to His children. Furthermore Mormons believe that God "established the (US) Constitution" to reinstate individual liberty in the world in preparation for the Millennial return of His Son.

MY "MORMON" CASE AGAINST PRESIDENT OBAMA

2016: Obama's America, a documentary movie I highly recommend, is very sympathetic to President Obama. After viewing the movie I could see how he has a genuine interest in the role of government in correcting inequality in society. Many Mormons also seek to see the poor rise and support government redistribution of wealth to achieve this goal. Equal opportunity is empowered by individual liberty as protected by the US Constitution; but equal outcomes are not guaranteed. Doctrinally, care for the poor is accomplished through voluntary contribution by individuals, not through government or even church involuntary taxation or redistribution of wealth. Mormon doctrine teaches that "every needy, naked soul ... their needs and wants" are to be taken care of by "people (who) ... should impart of their substance of their own free will and good desires towards God." Nowhere in scripture is forced care of the poor taught. Equal outcomes through forced redistribution can only be achieved through losses of individual liberty. God allows each of His children to achieve their potential through their own actions and the grace of Christ - the "righteous judge" of their "works."

In a 2001 radio interview, Illinois State Senator Obama made his views clear on the "flawed" Constitution and its obstruction to wealth redistribution (follow these links to various segments of the interview - the full interview is no longer available at WBEX.FM). He describes the Constitution as an "imperfect document ... reflect(ing) the fundamental flaw of this country that continues today." From a Mormon's perspective he did not recognize the divine perfection and establishment of that original Constitution. Slavery could not stand against it, neither unequal rights for women. The foundational principles and processes for change and review established by the Constitution, have corrected error in US society and enthroned individual liberty - as God intended. 

Paul Roderick Gregory in his Forbes article, Why the Fuss? Obama Has Long Been On Record In Favor Of Redistribution, does an excellent job of summarizing Senator Obama's views expressed in that 2001 interview:

QUOTE (with Senator Obama's statements in quotations):

First: “We still suffer from not having a Constitution that guarantees its citizens economic rights.” By positive economic rights, Obama means government protection against individual economic failures, such as low incomes, unemployment, poverty, lack of health care, and the like. Obama characterizes the Constitution as “a charter of negative liberties,” which “says what the states can’t do to you (and) what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf.”
Second, Obama regrets that the Constitution places “essential constraints” on the government’s ability to provide positive economic rights and that “we have not broken free” of these Constitutional impediments. Obama views the absence of positive economic liberties that the government must supply as a flaw in the Constitution that must be corrected as part of a liberal political agenda.
Third, Obama concludes that we cannot use the courts to break free of the limited-government constraints of the Founders. The courts are too tradition and precedent bound “to bring about significant redistributional change.” Even the liberal Warren Court “never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society.”
Fourth, Obama argues that economic rights that the state must supply are ultimately to be established at the ballot box. Those who favor redistribution must gain legislative control through an “actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change.” The electoral task of a redistributive President is therefore to craft coalitions of those who stand to benefit from government largess. The legislature, not the courts, must do this “reparative economic work.”

In sum, Obama views the Constitution as a flawed document from which we must “break free.” We need, instead, a “living” Constitution that refocuses from “negative rights” to requiring income redistribution from the Haves to provide “positive economic rights” to the Have Nots. 

END QUOTE

Heather Higgins also does a good job of describing Senator Obama's interview in her US News and World Report article,  Barack Obama's Poor Understanding of the Constitution, The Founding Fathers were correct in the way they set up the Constitution.

Then Senator Obama's arguments for wealth redistribution were a fundamental infringement on individual liberty. He is correct that the Constitution does not support redistribution of wealth - therefore he seeks extra-constitutional means to enact his plans. The Obamacare redistribution of health care through the government is an example of this approach. In order to achieve equal outcomes it restricts religious freedom. Multiple Catholic lawsuits against the Affordable Health Care Act (Obamacare) are "to protect the conscience rights of health care providers and institutions that do not want to participate in abortion or assisted suicide ...." The Mormon church is clearly in support of Catholics and these concerns as shown in their official website statements on religious freedom. 

To a Mormon, arguments of equal outcomes is similar to the argument of Lucifer in Heaven. His equal outcome to "redeem all mankind, that one soul shall not be lost" could only be accomplished by "destroy(ing) the agency (liberty) of man, which ... the Lord God, had given him ...." Likewise, President Obama acts to change the Constitution which God "suffered to be established, and should be maintained for the rights and protection of all flesh, according to just and holy principles; that every man may act in doctrine and principle pertaining to futurity, according to the moral agency which I have given unto him, that every man may be accountable for his own sins (actions) in the day of judgment. Therefore, it is not right that any man should be in bondage one to another" - not the slave in bondage to the rich as in days past, or the rich in taxing bondage to the poor as our President intends.

To put it in Paul Roderic Gregory's words: 

QUOTE:

The Obama administration has given us a taste of an overbearing majority’s “schemes of oppression” (to use Madison’s words) not decided “according to rules of justice and the rights of the minor party:” the blackmailing of Chrysler bondholders, the transfer of property from creditors and shareholders to organized labor in the GM bailout, the attempted destruction of whole industries, such as coal, through regulation rather than legislation, transfers of income from lenders to borrowers under forced loan renegotiations, and the use of unelected and unapproved economic czars to redistribute income and wealth by executive fiat.

END QUOTE

Add to these the redistribution of Obamacare, the individual mandate of which could only pass Supreme Court scrutiny under the governments power to "tax;" the failure to have the Justice Department defend the Defense of Marriage Act in Court; and the failure to uphold immigration laws.

As Americans we have a great blessing and responsibility to exercise our vote. "I, the Lord God, make you free, therefore ye are free indeed; and the law also maketh you free. Nevertheless, when the wicked rule the people mourn. Wherefore, honest men and wise men should be sought for diligently, and good men and wise men ye should observe to uphold; otherwise whatsoever is less than these cometh of evil." 

I see President Obama's actions and the Progressive Democrat agenda with respect to the Constitution as "evil" in that they do not support God's Constitution of individual liberty. I balance that statement with the observation that by Mormon doctrine we also know that President Obama is one of the valiant sons of God that upheld the principle of maintaining individual liberty in Heaven - had he not, he would not be upon the Earth with a physical body, with the opportunity to exercise his liberty and learn for himself that "wickedness never was happiness."

May God bless the President of the United States, and may we uphold the Constitution of individual liberty that the current President opposes buy electing a Constitutional Republican in 2016.

The following quotes on the US Constitution are accepted by Mormons as scripture from God:

77 According to the laws and constitution of the people, which I have suffered to be established, and should be maintained for the rights and protection of all flesh, according to just and holy principles;
78 That every man may act in doctrine and principle pertaining to futurity, according to the moral agency which I have given unto him, that every man may be accountable for his own sins in the day of judgment.
79 Therefore, it is not right that any man should be in bondage one to another.
80 And for this purpose have I established the Constitution of this land, by the hands of wise men whom I raised up unto this very purpose, and redeemed the land by the shedding of blood.

4 And now, verily I say unto you concerning the laws of the land, it is my will that my people should observe to do all things whatsoever I command them.
5 And that law of the land which is constitutional, supporting that principle of freedom in maintaining rights and privileges, belongs to all mankind, and is justifiable before me.
6 Therefore, I, the Lord, justify you, and your brethren of my church, in befriending that law which is the constitutional law of the land;
7 And as pertaining to law of man, whatsoever is more or less than this, cometh of evil.
8 I, the Lord God, make you free, therefore ye are free indeed; and the law also maketh you free.
9 Nevertheless, when the wicked rule the people mourn.
10 Wherefore, honest men and wise men should be sought for diligently, and good men and wise men ye should observe to uphold; otherwise whatsoever is less than these cometh of evil.

54 Have mercy, O Lord, upon all the nations of the earth; have mercy upon the rulers of our land; may those principles, which were so honorably and nobly defended, namely, the Constitution of our land, by our fathers, be established forever.

The Equal Outcome Argument and Preservation of Liberty in Heaven:

1 And I, the Lord God, spake unto Moses, saying: That Satan, whom thou hast commanded in the name of mine Only Begotten, is the same which was from the beginning, and he came before me, saying—Behold, here am I, send me, I will be thy son, and I will redeem all mankind, that one soul shall not be lost, and surely I will do it; wherefore give me thine honor.
2 But, behold, my Beloved Son, which was my Beloved and Chosen from the beginning, said unto me—Father, thy will be done, and the glory be thine forever.
3 Wherefore, because that Satan rebelled against me, and sought to destroy the agency of man, which I, the Lord God, had given him, and also, that I should give unto him mine own power; by the power of mine Only Begotten, I caused that he should be cast down;
4 And he became Satan, yea, even the devil, the father of all lies, to deceive and to blind men, and to lead them captive at his will, even as many as would not hearken unto my voice.

7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
10 And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.

Care for the Poor:

27 And again Alma commanded that the people of the church should impart of their substance, every one according to that which he had; if he have more abundantly he should impart more abundantly; and of him that had but little, but little should be required; and to him that had not should be given.
28 And thus they should impart of their substance of their own free will and good desires towards God, and to those priests that stood in need, yea, and to every needy, naked soul.
29 And this he said unto them, having been commanded of God; and they did walk uprightly before God, imparting to one another both temporally and spiritually according to their needs and their wants.

14 I, the Lord, stretched out the heavens, and built the earth, my very handiwork; and all things therein are mine.
15 And it is my purpose to provide for my saints, for all things are mine.
16 But it must needs be done in mine own way; and behold this is the way that I, the Lord, have decreed to provide for my saints, that the poor shall be exalted, in that the rich are made low.
17 For the earth is full, and there is enough and to spare; yea, I prepared all things, and have given unto the children of men to be agents unto themselves.

18 Therefore, if any man shall take of the abundance which I have made, and impart not his portion, according to the law of my gospel, unto the poor and the needy, he shall, with the wicked, lift up his eyes in hell, being in torment.